The Unified Field of Being: A Trans-disciplinary Deconstruction of "God Is Consciousness"

1. Introduction: Deconstructing the Statement

1.1. The Dualistic Conundrum and the Non-Dual Hypothesis

The statement "God is consciousness and consciousness is God" represents a profound departure from the conventional Western, dualistic worldview. For millennia, many religious and philosophical systems have operated on a fundamental division between the creator and the created, the self and the other, or the mind and the body. God is typically conceived as a transcendent, external, and often anthropomorphic deity who exists outside of the material world He created.1 Similarly, human consciousness is frequently seen as a product of a physical brain, a localized phenomenon separate from other beings and the universe at large.

The non-dual hypothesis, however, challenges these deeply ingrained dichotomies.2 Drawing from traditions that emphasize the "absence of fundamental duality or separation in existence," this perspective posits a unified reality where the conventional boundaries between subject and object, mind and body, and self and other are seen as ultimately illusory. The statement under examination serves as a powerful expression of this view, suggesting that the ultimate reality, "God," is not a separate entity but is synonymous with the very nature of subjective experience, "consciousness." This is a vision of reality where the spiritual world is not transcendent and external but rather immanent and pervasive, permeating the mundane.1

1.2. Defining the Ineffable: A Lexicon for the Inquirer

To navigate this complex topic, a precise vocabulary is essential, even while acknowledging that the subject matter often defies conventional language. For the purposes of this analysis, "God" will be used as a placeholder for the ultimate, absolute, or singular reality—that which is ultimately responsible for the origin and order of all existence.3 This conceptualization often aligns with traditions of "negative theology" (

via negativa), which seek to describe the divine not by what it is but by what it is not, as the ultimate reality is considered too profound and complex for human language to fully capture.4

"Consciousness" is treated not as a mere biological function of the brain but as the fundamental ground of being—a universal field of awareness from which all phenomena emerge.6 This distinction is critical to understanding the core claim of the statement, as it elevates consciousness from a local, personal experience to a universal principle.

Furthermore, a crucial distinction must be drawn between non-dualism and monism.2 While both challenge dualism, their approaches differ. Monism posits that reality is grounded in a singular substance, reducing the multiplicity of existence to a singular foundation. In contrast, non-dualism, which literally means "not-two" or "non-secondness" (

Advaita), emphasizes unity amidst diversity. It holds that the many are not a reduction of the one but rather an appearance of the one, where reality is a unified field of experience beyond conceptual thought. This distinction allows for a more nuanced understanding of how diverse traditions articulate the relationship between the individual and the Absolute.

1.3. Methodological Overview

This report will proceed thematically to provide a comprehensive analysis. It will begin by tracing the historical and philosophical origins of this concept in ancient and classical thought. The analysis will then traverse four major spiritual traditions—Advaita Vedanta, Kabbalah, Taoism, and Christian Mysticism—to illuminate the trans-cultural parallels and unique interpretations of a unified reality. Finally, the report will engage with modern re-interpretations of the concept in fields ranging from contemporary philosophy and neuroscience to popular spiritual movements, followed by a critical discourse on the ethical and logical challenges inherent in the statement. This structured approach aims to provide a holistic and nuanced perspective, demonstrating the enduring significance of this idea across human history and thought.

2. Ancient Roots: The Evolution of "God-Consciousness"

2.1. The Dawn of the Spiritual: From Animism to Monotheism

The human impulse to define a supreme reality appears to be a direct reflection of the evolution of human cognition. Early man, confronted with the "God-vacuum"—the profound need to explain existence—sought to make sense of a world of overwhelming natural forces.3 Events like thunderstorms, earthquakes, and violent deaths were experienced with a sense of awe and helplessness. Unable to comprehend these phenomena through their everyday understanding of nature, primitive people concluded that these forces must be preternatural or spiritual.3

This initial encounter with the spiritual gave rise to animism, the belief in the vitality of inanimate entities. As detailed in philosophical analyses, this was the first step in the "evolutionary process of the conversion of nature to gods." Primitive humans began to localize these spirits in everyday nature—rivers, trees, mountains—and eventually symbolized them in wood, iron, or clay. These objects of animism would eventually become divinities, leading to the creation of gods and the invention of worship.3 This "invention of the gods" was rooted in the human mind's "compartmentalized understanding of nature," an inability to perceive the universe as a "single unified system".3 The existence of multiple gods for multiple natural forces was a direct consequence of this fragmented cognitive state. The more a mind becomes aware of the cosmos as a unified whole, the more sophisticated the question of God becomes, leading to the logical necessity of a single, unified principle—a monotheistic or non-dualistic God.3 The progression from animism to more unified concepts of the divine is, therefore, a causal relationship between the mind's expanding capacity to perceive a "single unified system" and its conceptualization of a singular, all-encompassing reality.

2.2. The Nasadiya Sukta: A Metaphysical Origin Story

One of the earliest and most profound expressions of a non-dual reality can be found in the Nasadiya Sukta, or the "Hymn of Creation," from the 10th mandala of the Rigveda.7 This hymn does not posit a simple creation myth with a definite creator but instead contemplates a primordial state that is inherently beyond dualistic distinctions. It begins with the paradoxical statement, "Then, there was neither existence, nor non-existence," rejecting the possibility of a simple, binary origin.2

The hymn proceeds with a series of negations, describing a time when there was "neither death nor immortality," "no distinguishing sign of night nor of day".7 The ultimate reality is referred to only as "That One" which "breathed, windless, by its own impulse," a state so subtle and undifferentiated that it defies all positive description.7 The hymn concludes with the acknowledgment that even the gods who came into being after creation may not know its true origin. This use of apophatic language—describing the ultimate reality by what it is not—establishes a trans-traditional pattern that would recur in the most profound spiritual inquiries.7 It suggests that the ultimate ground of being, or God-consciousness, is inherently beyond the limits of dualistic language and intellectual thought. This metaphysical approach, born from a "visionary, mystical or Yogic experience," points to a reality that can only be approached through the negation of all conceptual frameworks.7

2.3. From Nous to the Absolute Mind

The concept of a universal, intelligent principle also has a rich history in Western philosophy. Anaxagoras, a pre-Socratic philosopher, introduced the concept of Nous ("mind" or "reason") as the intelligent force that set matter in motion and ordered the universe.8 He taught that the growth of living things was dependent on this power of mind, a view for which he was commended by Aristotle. However, both Plato and Aristotle found Anaxagoras's concept insufficient, as it did not suggest that

Nous acted ethically or for the "best interests" of the universe.8 Anaxagoras's

Nous was a largely external, ordering principle, a deistic concept of a mind that set things in motion but did not necessarily embody the universe itself.

This idea of a universal mind was later refined and expanded by philosophers such as Hegel. In his work, Hegel described "Mind as the true and essential being," and the "knowledge of Mind" as the highest and most difficult of sciences.8 Hegel’s concept of Mind was not an external, detached force but was described as "man's genuine reality—of what is essentially and ultimately true and real".8 This philosophical progression from Anaxagoras's external ordering principle to Hegel's internal, foundational reality mirrors a broader spiritual and philosophical movement. The shift from a separate, deistic God to an immanent, non-dual consciousness that is the true and essential nature of all things, marks a crucial conceptual evolution from viewing a divine mind as an external agent to seeing it as the fundamental reality of being itself.

3. Pillars of Non-Dual Wisdom: The Great Traditions

3.1. Advaita Vedanta: Brahman, Ātman, and the Dance of Māyā

Advaita Vedanta, a Hindu tradition, is perhaps the most explicit and philosophically detailed articulation of the statement "God is consciousness".9 The term

Advaita literally means "non-secondness" and is typically translated as "non-duality." Its central tenet is the identity of Jivatman, the individual self, and Brahman, the ultimate, highest Self or Reality.9 This is famously expressed in the phrase "That Thou Art" (

Tat Tvam Asi), signifying that the individual self is not separate from the universal reality.11

The phenomenal world, known as Prakriti, is regarded as an illusory appearance (Māyā) or "an unreal manifestation" of Brahman.9 This does not mean the world is "fake" but rather that its apparent plurality and separateness are not ultimately real. A common metaphor likens objects like rings and bracelets to the underlying gold from which they are made; the rings and bracelets have no existence of their own, but are merely appearances of the one existent, gold.12

The paradox of why, if one is Brahman, one experiences a limited, separate self is explained through the concept of "reflected consciousness".12 According to this model, the infinite, actionless Original Consciousness (OC) is "reflected" by the intellect, creating a finite, empirical Reflected Consciousness (RC) that generates the sense of a separate self, or ego. This ego, along with the mind-body complex, participates in the transient world of empirical transactions, mistakenly identifying with the reflection rather than the original.12 Liberation (

Moksha) is achieved through Vidyā (knowledge), which involves disidentification from this body-mind complex and the recognition of one's true identity as Ātman/Brahman.9 This knowledge is not intellectual but experiential, attained through a disciplined, three-step practice of

sravana (hearing), manana (thinking), and nididhyasana (meditation).9 The Advaita model thus provides a sophisticated psychological framework to explain the subjective experience of a separate self within an objective, non-dual reality, offering a causal explanation for human delusion.

3.2. Kabbalah: Ein Sof, Emanation, and the Repair of the World

In Jewish mysticism, the Kabbalah presents a dynamic and complex non-dual framework centered on the concept of Ein Sof ("no end" or "the infinite").13

Ein Sof is the unknowable, ultimate source of all being, existing before any self-manifestation.13 It is described apophatically as "Nothingness/Fullness," a state beyond all attributes and conscious knowing.15

From this transcendent source, the divine emanates through a series of ten Sefirot—divine attributes or emanations arranged in a hierarchy known as the Tree of Life.13 These

Sefirot represent the unfolding of divine consciousness from the infinite, undifferentiated source (Ein Sof) into the finite, created universe. They are the channels through which the transcendent becomes immanent, with the human soul mirroring this divine structure.14 The

Sefirot thus provide a causal mechanism for how an utterly unknowable God can become a dynamic, accessible, and interactive reality, one that is both within and beyond the human experience.

A particularly unique aspect of Kabbalah is the role of humanity in this divine process. The Lurianic Kabbalah introduces the idea of Tikkun Olam ("repair of the world").15 Here, human actions are not merely a means of worship but are essential for the "completion of G-d and the world." This process is described as a "balancing of the opposites" and the integration of conscious and unconscious forces, a goal to be achieved by each person and, ultimately, by humanity as a whole.15 The Kabbalistic model suggests a symbiotic, co-creative relationship where human consciousness is not just a reflection of the divine but an active participant in its ongoing unfolding. This conception of a God who is in need of man stands in stark contrast to the philosophical "unmoved mover" and imbues human religious practice with a profound, theurgic element.16

3.3. Taoism: The Undifferentiated Way

Taoism, a philosophical and religious tradition from China, offers another distinct perspective on non-duality. The Tao (or Dao), which translates to "way" or "path," is the natural way of the universe—an enigmatic, non-dualistic principle that underlies all reality.17 It is not a deity to be worshipped but a flow to be aligned with, described metaphorically as being like water: undifferentiated, endlessly self-replenishing, and immensely powerful yet quiet.17 The

Tao is the "greater whole from which all the individual elements of the Universe derive".17 This non-dual principle is represented by the yin-yang symbol, which reflects the transcendence of binary oppositions like light and dark, good and evil.2

The Taoist path emphasizes achieving a harmonious existence by aligning oneself with the cyclical continuity of the natural world and freeing oneself from the linear, goal-oriented actions of the human mind. The central practice is Wu wei, or effortless action, which requires a deeper appreciation of the Tao and a rejection of the idea of a separate, individualized self.18 In contrast to Advaita Vedanta's focus on realizing ontological identity ("I am That"), Taoism focuses on living in harmony with the natural flow. This highlights a crucial distinction in non-dual thought: is the ultimate reality something one

is, or something one aligns with? The Taoist model suggests that non-duality is a family of ideas with different emphases, leading to distinct spiritual practices and goals.

3.4. Christian Mysticism: The Godhead and the Via Negativa

Within the predominantly dualistic framework of Christianity, a powerful non-dual impulse can be found in the tradition of Christian mysticism. The 14th-century mystic Meister Eckhart made a crucial distinction between "God" and the "Godhead".19 He conceived of God as the triune, manifest, and personal creator, while the Godhead was a formless, unmanifest, and ultimately unknowable absolute that preceded the creation of the world. This distinction allowed for a non-dual understanding of the divine within a dualistic theological context. Eckhart’s famous quote, "My eye and God's eye are one eye and one seeing, one knowing and one loving," expresses this profound non-dual union.20

The path to this union is often described as the via negativa ("the negative way"), a contemplative practice that involves approaching God by what He is not.4 A key text in this tradition,

The Cloud of Unknowing, a 14th-century work of Christian mysticism, instructs the practitioner to "abandon consideration of God's particular activities and attributes" and surrender their mind and ego to a realm of "unknowing".21 This practice is a direct rejection of intellectual or conceptual knowledge as a means of achieving divine union. The ultimate aim is to "beat on that thick cloud of unknowing with a sharp dart of longing love" until a direct, non-conceptual union with God is glimpsed.21 The presence of such a practice within a dualistic tradition demonstrates that the non-dual impulse is a fundamental human spiritual experience. It shows how mystics, driven by a desire for direct union, developed a specific methodology—the

via negativa—that bypasses the intellectual limitations of a dualistic theological framework.

4. The Modern Synthesis: Science, Philosophy, and Spiritual Practice

4.1. Panpsychism: Mind as a Foundational Property

In contemporary philosophy, panpsychism has emerged as a modern, secular framework that parallels ancient non-dual traditions.24 Panpsychism is the view that all things, from the smallest subatomic particles to complex organisms, have a mind or a mind-like quality.25 This perspective is presented as a potential solution to the "hard problem of consciousness"—the challenge of explaining how subjective experience can arise from inert matter. The argument is based on the idea that mind cannot emerge from non-mind, and therefore, some form of mind must have been a fundamental property of the universe from the very beginning.25

Panpsychism provides a contemporary bridge between the metaphysical idealist claim of a conscious universe and modern scientific inquiry.6 The failure of the dominant materialist paradigm to adequately explain the origin of consciousness has led to a resurgence of these ancient ideas, reframed in a new philosophical vocabulary. However, this view faces a significant challenge known as the "combination problem": if the fundamental parts of a human (e.g., atoms) have a form of mind, it remains unclear how these individual, micro-level consciousnesses combine to form the single, unified, and complex consciousness of a human being.25

4.2. Quantum Consciousness: Entanglement and the Fabric of Reality

The mysteries of quantum mechanics have also been leveraged to explore the nature of consciousness. The quantum mind or quantum consciousness is a group of speculative hypotheses proposing that consciousness cannot be explained by classical physics alone but may arise from quantum phenomena like entanglement and superposition.26 Proponents like physicist Roger Penrose and anaesthesiologist Stuart Hameroff have suggested that non-computable processes occurring in the brain's microtubules could be the physical basis for consciousness.26

The quantum consciousness hypothesis is not a proven scientific theory but rather a powerful metaphor that demonstrates the human desire to find a physical basis for metaphysical claims. The concept of a "quantum hive mind," where an interconnected quantum intelligence could function as a "singular, omnipresent entity," serves as a modern interpretation of a universal consciousness.28 This intellectual pursuit, however, faces significant scientific critique. A primary argument against it is the problem of "decoherence"—the loss of quantum states due to interaction with the environment.26 Physicists argue that the warm, wet environment of the brain would cause quantum states to decohere far too quickly to play a role in neural processing, which operates on much slower timescales.26 The hypothesis also lacks a testable, falsifiable mechanism, a key requirement for a scientific theory.26 The reliance on these highly speculative aspects of physics to explain consciousness reveals a persistent intellectual impulse: to connect the most mysterious parts of the external world (quantum mechanics) to the greatest mystery of the internal world (consciousness).

4.3. Neuroscience and the Meditative Brain

In contrast to the speculative nature of quantum consciousness, neuroscience provides a potential causal link between the ancient practice of meditation and the subjective experience of non-duality. Modern research using fMRI and EEG has begun to map the neural correlates of non-dual experiences.11 Studies show that during non-dual meditation, there is a marked decrease in activity in the default mode network (DMN), a brain region associated with mind-wandering and self-referential thought.11 The dissolution of the sense of a separate self—a core tenet of non-dual practice—has a direct, measurable correlate in the brain's activity.

This empirical evidence suggests that non-dual states are not purely abstract or spiritual but have a physiological basis. Furthermore, regular meditation practice has been shown to induce neuroplasticity, leading to lasting changes in brain structure and function, such as increased grey matter and enhanced connectivity in areas related to attention and emotional regulation.11 This implies that the journey toward non-dual realization is not a passive insight but an active process of literally rewiring the brain to experience reality in a unified way. Neuroscience thus provides an invaluable bridge between subjective, first-person experience and objective, third-person data, offering a neurological mechanism for the spiritual claims of ego dissolution and unity consciousness.

4.4. Modern Movements: From New Thought to Self-Sovereignty

The concept of a universal consciousness was popularized in the 19th and 20th centuries through movements like New Thought and New Age.29 These movements re-framed "Infinite Intelligence" as a force for positive thinking and manifestation, giving rise to the idea that "our mental states are carried forward into manifestation".29 This led to a conception of "consciousness as a currency," where one's thoughts and beliefs are seen as the medium through which reality is created.31 Adherents believe they can use visualization techniques to manifest wealth, success, and self-healing.30

However, these movements have faced significant criticism for their potential to be "toxic, judgmental, elitist" and for lacking a foundation in scientific evidence, sometimes leading to cult-like behavior.33 This commercialization and commodification of spiritual concepts raise ethical questions about the true purpose of non-duality. In response to these critiques, a more ethically grounded concept has emerged in modern spiritual circles: "personal sovereignty".35 This framework defines sovereignty as the "executive expression of consciousness," a dynamic process of self-governance and personal responsibility.35 It shifts the focus from passively manifesting reality to actively guiding one's awareness, taking ownership of one's inner state, and acting with moral agency within a unified reality.35 This evolution from passive manifestation to active sovereignty represents a crucial attempt to link metaphysical realization to ethical action, providing a moral compass that a purely passive or self-serving non-dualism might lack.

5. Critical Discourse: The Challenges of a Unified Reality

5.1. The Paradox of Illusion and Suffering

One of the most significant challenges to the statement "God is consciousness and consciousness is God" is the problem of suffering. If the ultimate reality is a perfect, omniscient, and unified consciousness, how can it logically contain or allow for real suffering, illusion, and evil?37 The traditional non-dual response, that suffering is part of the illusion (

Māyā), is often seen as intellectually and compassionately inadequate. Bhakti yoga, a personalist tradition of devotion, poses this critique directly: if we are all God, why are we trapped in illusion? Such a logical contradiction, the argument goes, undermines either the nature of God or the reality of our experience.37 This is a more profound version of the classic problem of evil, suggesting that an impersonal, non-dual absolute cannot provide a coherent framework for the messy, painful, and often chaotic emotional dimensions of human existence.

5.2. Individuality and the Soul's Journey

A related critique, also from personalist traditions, is that non-dualism "destroys individuality" and leads to "spiritual suicide".37 These traditions, which include Christian mysticism and Bhakti yoga, argue that the ultimate reality is not an impersonal oneness but a divine person with whom one can have a loving, eternal relationship.37 The value of love, devotion, and compassion is contingent on the reality of a separate "other" to whom one can relate. The idea that relationships, emotions, and the sense of self are mere illusions to be transcended erases the very foundation of these values. The Bhagavad Gita, for instance, affirms that individuality exists eternally, even after liberation.37 This suggests a fundamental tension between the metaphysical elegance of a unified consciousness and the necessity of individual, relational existence for a meaningful spiritual journey.

5.3. From "Is" to "Ought": The Normativity Problem

The statement also faces a crucial ethical challenge from secular philosophy, often called the "Normativity Problem".39 If the universe is a non-relational, amoral, and unified consciousness, what is the basis for moral imperatives? A worldview that offers no "divine sanction, no metaphysical imperative" for moral behavior struggles to explain why we "ought" to be good, just, or compassionate.39

Secular philosophers note that the universe is wild and "monstrous enough...to have generated life," and that its parts are often "at odds with other parts" as each pursues its own ends.39 In this context, appealing to a humanist morality rooted in creativity or a sense of universal unity becomes a difficult task, as there is no credible mechanism by which this unity becomes ethically binding. This critique highlights a central flaw in both secular and spiritual non-dual frameworks: while they may provide a powerful metaphysical explanation of what

is, they often fail to provide a compelling and coherent foundation for what we ought to do. The causal factor is the impersonal nature of the non-dual absolute; the effect is the perceived erosion of values that are inherently relational (love, justice, compassion), which depend on the existence of a separate "other" to whom one can relate.

6. Conclusion: The Enduring Significance of the Quest

The statement "God is consciousness and consciousness is God" is not a simple proposition to be accepted or rejected but a complex and enduring hypothesis that has been explored by human thought for millennia. This report has demonstrated that while the vocabulary and cultural context may change, the underlying impulse to find a unified, singular reality persists. From the earliest philosophical contemplations of the Nasadiya Sukta and Anaxagoras's Nous to the detailed metaphysical systems of Advaita Vedanta and Kabbalah, and the modern secular philosophies of panpsychism, humanity has consistently sought to resolve the fundamental dualities of existence.

The value of this inquiry lies not in arriving at a final, dogmatic answer but in the transformative journey it inspires. As the analysis of neuroscience and meditative practice indicates, the experience of non-duality is not purely a mystical or abstract concept but has measurable effects on the brain, suggesting that the path of self-realization is an active process of cognitive and emotional transformation.11 Furthermore, the evolution from self-serving spiritual movements to the more ethically grounded concept of personal sovereignty highlights a crucial lesson: the spiritual quest for union must be balanced with the ethical necessity of individual action and responsibility in the world.35

Ultimately, the most significant critiques of the statement—the problem of suffering, the role of individuality, and the challenge of deriving moral purpose from an impersonal absolute—reveal its limitations as a complete framework for human life. The relational, emotional, and ethical dimensions of our existence may require a different model. However, the statement's enduring power lies in its capacity to serve as a "lived hypothesis"—an invitation to a profound inquiry into the nature of reality and the self. Its ultimate significance is not in the intellectual assent it demands but in the journey of self-realization it inspires, a journey that can provide a framework for profound, non-dual experience and a renewed sense of responsibility and purpose in a world often defined by its divisions.

Works cited

1. Immanence - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Immanence
2. Nondualism - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nondualism
3. Indiana Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Research Article ..., accessed August 10, 2025, https://indianapublications.com/articles/IJHSS_6(2)_20-27_67bf318f7743e3.98271328.pdf
4. Negative Theology - Brill - Reference Works, accessed August 10, 2025, https://referenceworks.brill.com/display/entries/EECO/SIM-045194.xml
5. What is negative theology? | GotQuestions.org, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.gotquestions.org/negative-theology.html
6. Idealism - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idealism
7. Nasadiya Sukta - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nasadiya_Sukta
8. Universal mind - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_mind
9. Advaita Vedanta - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advaita_Vedanta
10. Advaita Vedanta - Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 10, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/advaita-vedanta/
11. The Neuroscience of Non-Dual Meditation - Number Analytics, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.numberanalytics.com/blog/neuroscience-non-dual-meditation
12. Q.502 Brahman and Awareness | Advaita Vision, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.advaita-vision.org/brahman-and-awareness/
13. Ein Sof - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ein_Sof
14. Sefirot - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sefirot
15. www.valleybeitmidrash.org, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.valleybeitmidrash.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/Gottlieb-Kabbala-and-Consciousness.pdf
16. The Mystical Theology of Kabbalah: From God to Godhead (Chapter 8) - Cambridge University Press, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/cambridge-companion-to-jewish-theology/mystical-theology-of-kabbalah-from-god-to-godhead/CE2F57A1AFEDF4BB1DD5F34B14A5D118
17. Tao - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tao
18. Taoism - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taoism
19. Meister Eckhart - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Meister_Eckhart
20. A deeper level of Consciousness | WCCM, accessed August 10, 2025, https://wccm.org/weekly-teachings/a-deeper-level-of-consciousness/
21. The Cloud of Unknowing - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Cloud_of_Unknowing
22. The Cloud Of Unknowing: A Summary For Mystics - Andrew Taggart, accessed August 10, 2025, https://andrewjtaggart.com/2021/05/18/the-cloud-of-unknowing-a-summary-for-mystics/
23. The Rise of the 'Holy Spirit' in Kabbalah | Harvard Divinity Bulletin, accessed August 10, 2025, https://bulletin.hds.harvard.edu/the-rise-of-the-holy-spirit-in-kabbalah/
24. Panpsychism and the Problem of Consciousness - Beshara Magazine, accessed August 10, 2025, https://besharamagazine.org/science-technology/panpsychism-and-the-problem-of-consciousness/
25. Panpsychism | Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, accessed August 10, 2025, https://iep.utm.edu/panpsych/
26. Quantum mind - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_mind
27. Quantum Theory of Consciousness - Scientific Research Publishing, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation?paperid=128000
28. The Dawn of Quantum Consciousness: The Emergence of Synthetic ..., accessed August 10, 2025, https://liorgd.medium.com/the-dawn-of-quantum-consciousness-the-emergence-of-synthetic-super-intelligence-beyond-human-2d61bc616d6e
29. New Thought - Wikipedia, accessed August 10, 2025, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_Thought
30. The New Age Movement - Knowing the Bible, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.knowingthebible.net/comparative-religions/the-new-age-movement
31. medium.com, accessed August 10, 2025, https://medium.com/rome-magazine/consciousness-is-our-currency-60d3d9b9a6da#:~:text=When%20we%20start%20to%20consider,we%20create%20for%20our%20world.
32. CONSCIOUS CURRENCY - Baby Lemonade Store, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.babylemonadestore.com.au/pages/conscious-currency
33. The New Age Movement: Fad or Menace - ICSA Articles 2, accessed August 10, 2025, https://articles2.icsahome.com/articles/the-new-age-movement--fad-or-menace-dole-csj-7-1-1990
34. No more "new age" for me - still spiritual but more skeptical than ever - Reddit, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/spirituality/comments/14iwyt5/no_more_new_age_for_me_still_spiritual_but_more/
35. (PDF) Personal Sovereignty and Consciousness: The Inner Architecture of Selfhood, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/394099628_Personal_Sovereignty_and_Consciousness_The_Inner_Architecture_of_Selfhood
36. The 7 Keys to Spiritual and Personal Sovereignty | Josephine Hardman, PhD, accessed August 10, 2025, https://josephinehardman.com/the-7-keys-to-spiritual-and-personal-sovereignty/
37. Non-Duality: 3 Fatal Flaws You Need to Know (Advaita Vedanta) - YouTube, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1f2KnkGwSFo
38. Please explain dualism and non-dualism to me like I'm 5. : r/spirituality - Reddit, accessed August 10, 2025, https://www.reddit.com/r/spirituality/comments/ugjzez/please_explain_dualism_and_nondualism_to_me_like/
39. Should Secular Philosophy be Rooted in Cosmic Horror? - Medium, accessed August 10, 2025, https://medium.com/grim-tidings/should-secular-philosophy-be-rooted-in-cosmic-horror-5806adf43f18